Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28451431FBD for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:33:06 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pe+QB-haWx-g for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:32:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A231B431FAF for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:32:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W5mgc-0006Ys-Pa; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 21:32:58 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 12484 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:32:55 -0000 From: David Bremner To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: [PATCH] test: make test_emacs call post-command-hook Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 21:32:45 -0400 Message-Id: <1390354365-12311-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.5.2 In-Reply-To: <1387064676-15508-6-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> References: <1387064676-15508-6-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:33:06 -0000 From: Mark Walters The unread/read changes will use the post-command-hook. test_emacs does not call the post-command-hook. This adds a notmuch-test-progn which takes a list of commands as argument and executes them in turn but runs the post-command-hook after each one. The caller can batch operations (ie to stop post-command-hook from being interleaved) by wrapping the batch of operations inside a progn. We also explicitly run the post-command-hook before getting the output from a test; this makes sense as this will be a place the user would be seeing the information. --- What do you think about this alternate version? it allows notmuch-test-progn to have the same syntax as progn. It seems about the same level of complexity to me; fwiw I prefer the let over the dolist/setq. test/test-lib.el | 13 +++++++++++++ test/test-lib.sh | 2 +- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/test/test-lib.el b/test/test-lib.el index 37fcb3d..a12ad97 100644 --- a/test/test-lib.el +++ b/test/test-lib.el @@ -52,11 +52,13 @@ (defun test-output (&optional filename) "Save current buffer to file FILENAME. Default FILENAME is OUTPUT." + (notmuch-post-command) (write-region (point-min) (point-max) (or filename "OUTPUT"))) (defun test-visible-output (&optional filename) "Save visible text in current buffer to file FILENAME. Default FILENAME is OUTPUT." + (notmuch-post-command) (let ((text (visible-buffer-string))) (with-temp-file (or filename "OUTPUT") (insert text)))) @@ -165,3 +167,14 @@ nothing." (t (notmuch-test-report-unexpected output expected))))) + +(defun notmuch-post-command () + (run-hooks 'post-command-hook)) + +(defmacro notmuch-test-progn (&rest body) + (cons 'progn + (mapcar + (lambda (x) `(let ((ret ,x)) + (notmuch-post-command) + ret)) + body))) diff --git a/test/test-lib.sh b/test/test-lib.sh index 78af170..27dcb59 100644 --- a/test/test-lib.sh +++ b/test/test-lib.sh @@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ test_emacs () { rm -f OUTPUT touch OUTPUT - ${TEST_EMACSCLIENT} --socket-name="$EMACS_SERVER" --eval "(progn $@)" + ${TEST_EMACSCLIENT} --socket-name="$EMACS_SERVER" --eval "(notmuch-test-progn $@)" } test_python() { -- 1.8.5.2