Return-Path: <BATV+7d079ec6ed591f168fc6+2419+infradead.org+hohndel@bombadil.srs.infradead.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660A24196F2
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  8 Apr 2010 07:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id IQYzLFlEt7aG for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Thu,  8 Apr 2010 07:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24134196F0
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  8 Apr 2010 07:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=localhost.localdomain)
	by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 1Nzt8u-0004rY-Pd; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:55:40 +0000
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 4F20CC00E4; Thu,  8 Apr 2010 07:55:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org>
To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>, Carl Worth
	<cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)
In-Reply-To: <87vdc2aw6i.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
References: <8739z6rjxf.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<87vdc2aw6i.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:55:40 -0700
Message-ID: <m3vdc2gfir.fsf@x200.gr8dns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hohndel@infradead.org> by
	bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:55:43 -0000

On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:52:21 -0400, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
> > So keep the patches coming, and the pointers to patches that you want me
> > to look at.
> 
> I would really like to see the patch in spaetz/issue15-handle-fcc-bcc
> applied soon.  This is the lingering issue of bcc'ing the primary email
> address in notmuch replies, which I think really needs to be removed.

+1

The FCC solution is much more sane. Especially with the From address
based path selection that I proposed (but haven't been able to implement
for lack of Lisp skills)

/D

-- 
Dirk Hohndel
Intel Open Source Technology Center