From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
To: Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com>,
	Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>,
	Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: Preventing the user shooting themself in the foot
In-Reply-To: <87vcvnnh7r.fsf@canonical.com>
References: <86iproe86u.fsf@greenrd.plus.com>
	<87fwms45xz.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<BANLkTi=StMS67+UwQbm8cUH3yNr_ySrN5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<874o37513c.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<87vcvnnh7r.fsf@canonical.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-292-gaa2fa19 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:37:59 -0700
Message-ID: <8739iqlzx4.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:26:48 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@ca=
nonical.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:40:07 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
> Non-text part: multipart/mixed
> Non-text part: multipart/signed
>=20
> not sure why notmuch reply is putting that there :)

They shouldn't be, and I sent a patch to fix that a while ago:

id:"1307561409-5646-3-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net"

But of course feel free to delete them before sending.

> I'm come to strongly agree that this is the Right Way to process email
> too, so should there be a keybinding for this last operation?  It should
> tag the message (or the thread?) with, say, 'task', and then proceeded
> as 'a' does.  'task' should be in the default searches you get in
> the notmuch hello buffer.

While I agree that Carl's method is pretty good, there is absolutely no
"Right Way" to process email; it's a completely personal, subjective
thing.  "Right Way" implies to me that other people *should* be
processing their mail that way, which I disagree with.

I'm generally against excessive unneeded configuration, but in the case
of key bindings it's definitely necessary.  Fortunately emacs is so
fundamentally flexible one can always modify the keybindings to their
hearts content.

jamie.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=OvN4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--