Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2411C431FCB for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:15:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k+ZOLhvyIx52 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:15:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from srv047132.webreus.nl (srv047132.webreus.nl [46.235.47.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6A54431FAE for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:15:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 19748 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2013 18:15:01 +0100 Received: from ip73-109-210-87.adsl2.static.versatel.nl (HELO PCvangebruike) (87.210.109.73) by srv047132.webreus.nl with SMTP; 30 Jan 2013 18:15:01 +0100 From: "Robert Mast" To: "'Carl Worth'" , "'Jani Nikula'" , References: <000001cdfcd9$82500f00$86f02d00$@nl> <87wquxjq7k.fsf@nikula.org> <002601cdfd83$83b283f0$8b178bd0$@nl> <87boc8bt8a.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> In-Reply-To: <87boc8bt8a.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> Subject: RE: Reply all - issue Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:14:48 +0100 Message-ID: <00bf01cdff0d$4ecedd10$ec6c9730$@nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac39yr2ciHq/BzOAQieJla7aevASjQBP0GPg Content-Language: nl X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:15:09 -0000 Thanks for your clear explanation. The thread-merging and breaking is in the procedure already pointed at by Jani: (_notmuch_database_link_message() in lib/database.cc.) Is there a quick way to recognize those git-threads by subject-syntax, or to reliably tag them to exclude them from subject-breaking? -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Carl Worth [mailto:cworth@cworth.org] Verzonden: dinsdag 29 januari 2013 3:48 Aan: Robert Mast; 'Jani Nikula'; notmuch@notmuchmail.org Onderwerp: RE: Reply all - issue Is there any existing thread-breaking? There wasn't the last time I looked at the code closely, (but admittedly, that was a while ago). -Carl