Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CAAA6DE0C1E for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 07:39:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.308 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.308 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.243, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id it3cYKTcg-B7 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 07:39:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B845A6DE12F3 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 07:39:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aQzWR-0007Nf-Q2; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 10:39:11 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 10425 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 03 Feb 2016 15:39:49 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jan Pobrislo , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Maildir custom flags and notmuch tags In-Reply-To: <87egctyfbd.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca> References: <1448504191-30974-1-git-send-email-igor.contato@gmail.com> <87mvsd7cxr.fsf@zancas.localnet> <20160202175220.12f8a712@dorje.v103.te2000> <87d1se9f2b.fsf@zancas.localnet> <20160203153250.56aa0b2b@dorje.v103.te2000> <87egctyfbd.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+5~gca076ce (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:39:49 -0400 Message-ID: <87bn7xyf96.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 15:39:54 -0000 David Bremner writes: > Jan Pobrislo writes: > >> >> Every such maildir extension out there that I know of was invented for >> some specific application. Out of the two documented formats there are, >> the dovecot-keywords file is: >> >> 1) more limited (26 tags maximum) >> 2) simpler to implement, especially wrt. detecting changes >> 3) usable out of the box with some tools, as you noted > > Actually, I just mean the extra maildir flags. I guess only the dovecot > sync tool syncs dovecot-keywords. And I don't think "notmuch+dsync > users" is a very big group, fwiw. Straight rsync would also transfer those files, of course. d