To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
	David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs
In-Reply-To: <87ehv7nd9r.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
References: <1325975294-646-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>
	<cunwr90ngms.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
	<87sjjns4wz.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>
	<87ehv7nd9r.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+186~gd0f7804 (http://notmuchmail.org)
	Emacs/24.0.92.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:26:03 +0000
Message-ID: <cunwr8ymyqs.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:12:16 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
> In fact, I'm now starting to think we don't need to add any support
> for special tagging operations (such as "deleted") even if we *do*
> have support for suppressing them in the CLI.  Special tagging
> operations should only be supported if the tagged messages are somehow
> handled specially.  If not, then again, we should just leave them up
> to the user [0].

Agreed.

The more interesting patch is the one that maps from the 'deleted' tag
to the 'T' bit, at least as someone who is mostly maildir-ignorant it
seems that way.

The keybindings are easy for a user to play with. The behaviour of the
core library much less so.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk8NR5sACgkQaezQq/BJZRYXjwCeMXiuOUDTKiKUF+XOKVBsq9Nc
S+AAn17AW5udcGszeZlPRJ/B/yuKMcf1
=jpNI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--