Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB16431FD0 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 05:07:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id irNY0TtzBnT0 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 05:07:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC89B431FB6 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 05:07:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from convex-new.cs.unb.ca ([131.202.13.154]) by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9VC75C8010123; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:07:06 -0300 Received: from bremner by convex-new.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RKqdt-0004yD-Sd; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:07:05 -0300 From: David Bremner To: Tomi Ollila , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove GCC visibility pragmas In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9+20~ga1ca7e8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:07:05 -0300 Message-ID: <8762j5icuu.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:07:12 -0000 On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:01:28 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > libnotmuch.so.* linking fail on some environments. According to > David Bremner on irc: > "We jump through hoops with the linker script (notmuch.sym) so > the pragmas are not needed. And they are a little bizarre in a > library anyway..." Despite the dubious people referenced, I pushed this patch. ;) d