MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87einv72cr.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
References: <1258569114-16034-1-git-send-email-jeff@ocjtech.us>
	<87einv72cr.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:56:22 -0600
Message-ID: <935ead450911182256j14722a61k7f24a971e0f81756@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeffrey Ollie <jeff@ocjtech.us>
To: Not Much Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [notmuch] RPM spec file
Precedence: list

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:31:53 -0600, "Jeffrey C. Ollie" <jeff@ocjtech.us> =
wrote:
>> I prefere managing all of the software on my system with RPM, so I
>> came up with a quick spec file for building RPMS. =C2=A0Once notmuch
>> settles down and I continue using it I may submit notmuch to Fedora as
>> an official package. =C2=A0If you'd like your own RPMS build your own, I
>> don't plan on offering a repository of binary packages.
>
> This sounds great, Jeffrey.
>
> What makes the most sense for this file? Shall we just leave it in the
> central repository? Or put it in its own rpm branch? I'm open to your
> suggestions here.

I don't think that a separate Git branch makes sense, but maybe stuff
like this should be in a subdirectory like "packaging/fedora", since I
imagine that there will eventually be a need for "packaging/debian"
etc. as well.

--=20
Jeff Ollie