Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A8D6DE1006 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 11:56:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.093 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.093 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.741, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.01, T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z6C9YGvHAQ3u for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 11:56:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E57B6DE0FB0 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 11:56:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjBRI-0001zq-Db; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:56:34 +0100 Received: from 5751dfa2.skybroadband.com ([87.81.223.162] helo=localhost) by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjBRI-0001Ww-5R; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:56:32 +0100 From: Mark Walters To: Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [RFC] lib: add support for date:..! to mean date:.. In-Reply-To: <1425732959-2282-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org> References: <1425732959-2282-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+86~gef5e66a (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:57:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87a8y6fuqw.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Sender-Host-Address: 87.81.223.162 X-QM-Geographic: According to ripencc, this message was delivered by a machine in Britain (UK) (GB). X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) X-QM-Body-MD5: 96ee783ea36004e61c3f2388004b0221 (of first 20000 bytes) X-SpamAssassin-Score: -0.0 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: / X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to determine if it is spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. This message scored -0.0 points. Summary of the scoring: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay * domain X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:56:44 -0000 Hi On Sat, 07 Mar 2015, Jani Nikula wrote: > Up to debate: > > 1) Is something like this useful at all as an intermediate step before > we can have support for date:? (This can be done with a future > version of Xapian, or with a custom query query parser.) This looks good to me. Yes it may not be needed in the future but the patch is very small. It passes all tests. +1 from me. > 2) If yes, are there better alternatives to "!" as the end point? (Or > should the special case be the start point?) Also "@" and "same" have > been suggested. Examples: date:yesterday..! date:today..@ > date:@..monday date:january..same. I would be happy with any of these. Best wishes Mark > > Idea from Mark Walters . > --- > lib/parse-time-vrp.cc | 5 +++++ > test/T500-search-date.sh | 4 ++++ > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/lib/parse-time-vrp.cc b/lib/parse-time-vrp.cc > index 33f07db3410e..03804cf50fa8 100644 > --- a/lib/parse-time-vrp.cc > +++ b/lib/parse-time-vrp.cc > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ Xapian::valueno > ParseTimeValueRangeProcessor::operator() (std::string &begin, std::strin= g &end) > { > time_t t, now; > + std::string b; >=20=20 > /* Require date: prefix in start of the range... */ > if (STRNCMP_LITERAL (begin.c_str (), PREFIX)) > @@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ ParseTimeValueRangeProcessor::operator() (std::string &= begin, std::string &end) >=20=20 > /* ...and remove it. */ > begin.erase (0, sizeof (PREFIX) - 1); > + b =3D begin; >=20=20 > /* Use the same 'now' for begin and end. */ > if (time (&now) =3D=3D (time_t) -1) > @@ -51,6 +53,9 @@ ParseTimeValueRangeProcessor::operator() (std::string &= begin, std::string &end) > } >=20=20 > if (!end.empty ()) { > + if (end =3D=3D "!" && ! b.empty ()) > + end =3D b; > + > if (parse_time_string (end.c_str (), &t, &now, PARSE_TIME_ROUND_UP_INCL= USIVE)) > return Xapian::BAD_VALUENO; >=20=20 > diff --git a/test/T500-search-date.sh b/test/T500-search-date.sh > index 70bcf344b4f7..18a47b114fa9 100755 > --- a/test/T500-search-date.sh > +++ b/test/T500-search-date.sh > @@ -8,6 +8,10 @@ test_begin_subtest "Absolute date range" > output=3D$(notmuch search date:2010-12-16..12/16/2010 | notmuch_search_s= anitize) > test_expect_equal "$output" "thread:XXX 2010-12-16 [1/1] Olivier Berge= r; Essai accentu=C3=A9 (inbox unread)" >=20=20 > +test_begin_subtest "Absolute date range with 'same' operator" > +output=3D$(notmuch search date:2010-12-16..! | notmuch_search_sanitize) > +test_expect_equal "$output" "thread:XXX 2010-12-16 [1/1] Olivier Berge= r; Essai accentu=C3=A9 (inbox unread)" > + > test_begin_subtest "Absolute time range with TZ" > notmuch search date:18-Nov-2009_02:19:26-0800..2009-11-18_04:49:52-06:00= | notmuch_search_sanitize > OUTPUT > cat <EXPECTED > --=20 > 2.1.4 > > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch