Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC1C4196F2 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:38:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VCv+ybbo5vsa; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:38:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDAC431FC1; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:38:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 383FF568DEC; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:38:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: Sebastian Spaeth , Jesse Rosenthal , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [notmuch] auto-tagging replied messages In-Reply-To: <87y6gfojvf.fsf@SSpaeth.de> References: <87pr3iygrx.fsf@jhu.edu> <87y6gfojvf.fsf@SSpaeth.de> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-173-gbae184f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:38:36 -0700 Message-ID: <87sk6lm3eb.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:38:37 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:35:16 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > On 2010-03-05, Jesse Rosenthal wrote: > > One element of traditional clients that I've missed in notmuch is the > > ability to easily see which messages have been replied to. A look at the > > thread structure will often make that clear, but for both searching and > > syncing, an "answered" tag would be nice. >=20 > This patch has been working great so far and is very useful. Can I > persuade someone to take this into the notmuch code and have a defcustom > as to which tag a reply should get (or disable if nil)? I'd like to see the in as well. Since we name the action of responding to a message "reply" in the documentation already, my vote for a default tag to add would be "replied". Supporting the removal of a tag as well is clever, but I wouldn't suggest doing that by default (the patch doesn't anyway). And instead, people could do things like searches for "tag:reply-required and not tag:replied". So here's my vote for someone cleaning this up into a patch that could be applied directly to notmuch rather than just being a snippet of code to shove into .emacs. =2DCarl --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFL0uZM6JDdNq8qSWgRAp3zAJ9cvVP+GsquDnt8DwZ06cGKWK1V0ACfSO/0 kyt3LVuDr/E122MQdNGOpLs= =D2Xe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--