Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6E96DE1A3F for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2016 03:23:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.681 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.681 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.029, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YWgk5nESi6Lv for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2016 03:23:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8356DE1642 for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2016 03:23:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id D823E10008D; Fri, 1 Jan 2016 13:23:37 +0200 (EET) From: Tomi Ollila To: David Bremner , Jani Nikula , "W. Trevor King" , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] nmbug-status: Add an nmbug-status(5) man page In-Reply-To: <87fuyi4iwm.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <0a1bd306cb2e306ff49d72b6d2466c1d4a0ade2b.1451502495.git.wking@tremily.us> <87ege26fi4.fsf@nikula.org> <87fuyi4iwm.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+32~g73439f8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 11:23:29 -0000 On Thu, Dec 31 2015, David Bremner wrote: > Jani Nikula writes: > >> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015, "W. Trevor King" wrote: >>> To describe the config file format, so folks don't have to dig through >>> NEWS or the nmbug-status source to get that information. >> >> Overall I approve of the series (though I did not do a thorough >> review). >> >> I am wondering about the man page though. I find it slightly confusing >> there would be a man page named after the tool describing just the >> config, but not the tool itself. > > For me it's a bit odd to have a man page for a tool we don't install by > default. Is it maybe time to "promote" nmbug-status to the notmuch- > namespace and install it by default? That would have to be somehow tied > to installing the python bindings; or else the script could just print a > helpful error message if the bindings are not found. > > This would also allow addressing Tomi's comment about testing, by adding > a couple of tests to the test suite. What we could simply have at the time being: devel/nmbug/nmbug devel/nmbug/nmbug.rst (or .1) devel/nmbug/nmbug-status devel/nmbug/nmbug-status.rst (or .1) devel/nmbug/nmbug-status-config devel/nmbug/nmbug-status-config.rst (or .5) (and if .rst:s, a Makefile to build the namual pages) The responsibility to install the tools could be outside of notmuch for now... Tomi > > d