From: David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca>
To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
	notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: output file argument to notmuch dump.
In-Reply-To: <87y5wsajec.fsf@washington.ligo-wa.caltech.edu>
References: <8739f5tzxj.fsf@zancas.localnet> <8739f2qhla.fsf@zancas.localnet>
	<87y5wsajec.fsf@washington.ligo-wa.caltech.edu>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9~rc2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:12:37 -0300
Message-ID: <87botop97u.fsf@zancas.localnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Precedence: list

On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:41:47 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:

> >    notmuch --stdout=foo.txt dump
> > 
> > could be dealt with later.
> 
> I realize the later probably requires more work, since we would have to
> replace all print calls with a new function, but I think it's the
> cleaner and more elegant solution.  There's no reason to have an output
> redirection option for "dump"s and not for any of the other commands.

As far as I know, freopen(3) makes this a one-liner. I think the hardest
part of this would be figuring out the name of the option ;)

d