Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F096431FAF for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 14:33:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uSmB3hgd8tE9 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 14:33:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a12.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdccac.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.202]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C466431FAE for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 14:33:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a12.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a12.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99B171406B; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 14:33:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sspaeth.de; h=references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:subject:from:date:to:cc :message-id:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=Fp 4P9Keac79dOHkp/sGa3mqGzzp2FjKA4eDTp1MDK5MAzfQkVW1cttSBE0XcPiaIzV sVB7cgjBKuDSRzJAm+aRmAgtdafu01AvulbV8BnOyt/GuRR4y3I03g7JJmXG0KOh t6F1BZ8V1XiJP4ZQxpaxdEhV5w7ecwNz1eNmdFads= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sspaeth.de; h=references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:subject:from:date:to:cc :message-id:content-transfer-encoding; s=sspaeth.de; bh=zVh1ama1 myVJR34/lvuSUj7PYIg=; b=Z8Qp/Vcntx+NzUkS05soci7sh+L8IKClpm58Nea4 zvMVXbCsUFIjnJLhU8cmoZ2pSgHrSWKVcWtxE0z0gCStCPXX3+uS7kabX8diP46y diL82DLBDim5jbbJauYPrWkqD1Hx7ozskNu80QUnQeuFsxSrDBc7z4QBRHMj7lhA D4k= Received: from [192.168.178.21] (unknown [176.46.225.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sebastian@sspaeth.de) by homiemail-a12.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0ED671406A; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 14:33:20 -0700 (PDT) References: User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: Why not tags inside messages? From: Sebastian Spaeth Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 23:33:15 +0200 To: Adam Wolfe Gordon ,David Belohrad Message-ID: <96da5cf7-1564-4122-9501-f1be3c1b1e2a@email.android.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:33:30 -0000 >On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 10:46, David Belohrad wrote: >> I'd love to use notmuch with offline imap =C2=A0to work rather on loca= l >copy of >> messages, than using remote notmuch, which is slightly slower due to >> bandwidth limitation of my vdsl line. There is however fundamental >problem >> of syncing flags between two instances of notmuch. So my question is, >> whether it would be possible, when tagging message, to store the tag >as well >> in the message itself. Might this help to sync across multiple >instances? My long-term dream is still to enable offlinemap to sync all imap flags a= nd sync notmuch flags via offlineimap/imap server. But don` t hold your b= reath :-)=20 Sebastian --=20 Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.