Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5BE431FB6 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 04:01:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mt5FhQfVAMpc for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 04:01:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E3AE431FAE for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 04:01:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWnHN-0000zD-Jy; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:01:46 -0400 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TWnHI-000480-3m; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:01:40 -0400 From: David Bremner To: Tomi Ollila , Mark Walters , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] contrib: pick: bugfix when trying to show a non-message In-Reply-To: References: <1351797983-19707-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> <87ehk332la.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+75~g984212d (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:01:40 -0400 Message-ID: <87a9ur2dej.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam_bar: - X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 12:01:53 -0000 Tomi Ollila writes: > Does (when COND BODY) connotate to the thought that the return value > is generally not used ? That expands to (if COND (progn BODY)) so both > returns exactly same values. Err, sorry. Too much scheme. I meant a two branch if (if COND BODY nil)