Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005B0431FAE for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 04:17:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d-mRCp4qVmTd for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 04:17:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 408D1431FB6 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 04:17:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by werb10 with SMTP id b10so3007002wer.26 for ; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 04:17:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.131.215 with SMTP id m65mr2733210wei.54.1328271465032; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 04:17:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([109.131.13.166]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ho4sm6158685wib.3.2012.02.03.04.17.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 03 Feb 2012 04:17:44 -0800 (PST) From: Pieter Praet To: Notmuch Mail Subject: olra.theworths.org mail forwarding delay? User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+132~ga81001f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:15:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87bopgp0y9.fsf@praet.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:17:47 -0000 It appears some messages really enjoy the hospitality @ olra.theworths.org, because they stick around and party for quite a while before moving to their final destinations. Here's some examples: - id:"m28vkzoo8r.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi" - rcv: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:33:56 -0800 (PST) - fwd: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 08:57:19 -0800 (PST) - id:"87pqeas5mh.fsf@gmail.com" - rcv: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:15:16 -0800 (PST) - fwd: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 08:57:25 -0800 (PST) - id:"m2hazk83xw.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi" - rcv: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:35:52 -0800 (PST) - fwd: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 08:57:30 -0800 (PST) - id:"alpine.DEB.2.02.1201132130220.21970@ltspubuntu4.int.smq.datapipe.net" - rcv: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:52:15 -0800 (PST) - fwd: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 08:56:35 -0800 (PST) That last one might have been stuck in the approval queue, but the others should definitely have propagated a lot sooner, no? Peace -- Pieter