Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2849431FC2 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 02:42:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cED6RCrW6hIQ for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 02:42:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BFF8429E5B for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 02:42:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjpC2-0008Hb-VN; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:42:07 +0000 Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost) by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TjpC2-0007cn-MX; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:42:06 +0000 From: Mark Walters To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: notmuch for christmas, again In-Reply-To: <87zk1g5a1r.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <87zk1g5a1r.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+155~g7edfdc3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:42:08 +0000 Message-ID: <8738z7a96n.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) X-QM-Body-MD5: 5f67f7149c3b13ad6055901abcf7f259 (of first 20000 bytes) X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: - X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to determine if it is spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. This message scored -1.8 points. Summary of the scoring: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:42:13 -0000 There are some pick patches I would quite like to get in: (note all patches below only touch contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el) id:1354970494-18050-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com bugfix to use archive tags rather than always "-inbox" id:1354970674-18136-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com bugfix so that running pick or search from split pane closes the split id:1355085019-18534-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com tweak so that message in message pane is not indented then there are some possibles: id:1355391109-4150-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com means that if the focus gets into the message pane then quitting from it closes the pane. This seems to work well and fixes a genuine issue but there might be better ways to fix it. (*) id:1354970914-18342-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com 2 patches to add some thread based operations to pick some tweaks so that various extra commands are available: eg stashing message ids, viewing attachments etc. This is not intrusive but since most of the patches above tweak key bindings the contexts tend to overlap. (*) The patches marked * redefine a couple of functions in notmuch-show.el so theoretically could cause breakage of vanilla notmuch functionality (but only if pick is loaded). Best wishes Mark On Sat, 15 Dec 2012, David Bremner wrote: > As a nascent tradition (see id:87obvaypwc.fsf@zancas.localnet), I'd like > to have a feature freeze on December 25, and release notmuch 0.15 around > January 1, 2013. > > As usual there are a few last minute requests > > - I'd like to get the two memory leak fixes in > id:1355234087-6886-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net > id:1355196820-29734-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net > > - Austin requested the scheme versioning patches; I think he will send a > followup to id:1354416002-3557-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu soon. > > Generally speaking anything that happens to get reviewed and polished > before the feature freeze is fine > > - I know Damien has been working pretty hard on > id:1355404167-31750-1-git-send-email-damien.cassou@gmail.com and I > have the impression that it is either ready or very close. > > - It would be nice to get the batch tagging stuff in > (id:1355492062-7546-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net) but it can > also wait for the next release if it isn't ready. > > Anything else people want to push for (and presumably review)? > > d > > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch