Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12EDA431FC2 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 10:04:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZJu+aw7LpU0o for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 10:04:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52CB3431FC0 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 10:04:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XvVKX-0001EP-84; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 14:04:13 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 6675 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 01 Dec 2014 18:04:06 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Charles Celerier , David Edmondson , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: Added "is:" style completion to notmuch-read-query. In-Reply-To: References: <1417219835-92141-1-git-send-email-cceleri@cs.stanford.edu> <1417279197-90877-1-git-send-email-cceleri@cs.stanford.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+2~g32855b9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 19:04:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87fvcz457t.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 18:04:26 -0000 Charles Celerier writes: > Can the variables in the varlist depend on the definition of variables > that precede them in the list? I believe I tried your suggestion, but > quickly gave up as Emacs gave me an error claiming that all-tags was > void. That's the point of lexical-let* vs lexical-let d