Return-Path: <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898DF431FC2
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  9 May 2014 05:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.799
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
	FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id GEQobLQxDxcv for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Fri,  9 May 2014 05:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ee0-f49.google.com (mail-ee0-f49.google.com
 [74.125.83.49])	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))	(No client
 certificate requested)	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
 972FA431FBC	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  9 May 2014 05:50:08 -0700
 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f49.google.com with SMTP id e53so2634274eek.8
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 09 May 2014 05:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition
	:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=IUK//qR2s0X8RHBoB1+VZbGZoDGMhL4exMY8viUUcbk=;
	b=eQ3x+AnWPLWPTJZCrR1ijqyNVTy08Am/e3w+W82KS5kYXN8GLX0Muif7aAVT5PFpSl
	haAorblQJcS9+dN4RVxaY22+v0rpjovNhvOt9jl5Y8B/x1EwkIRAIUSbXK7ab8Mfjlu5
	CB/oMUPYXS/EWC4ROXnqjQR6VyIPP0J846iMsi28S93fJjIvx3S5LnwbgGZYE+wf8LVx
	IaHb+kx6CwnLj4hr6J1cYaKFlJMk0XXHvr24SVQnHmpuPOjupJSXd60nJhcJ26fy+YeM
	aJOF/YvU5dQroPsyauPTQ/XO8zxAFap63AqxEitVWA9PvENYLk7zTAlK7loD4vHu+8gT
	U0Fg==
X-Received: by 10.15.35.66 with SMTP id f42mr13071037eev.93.1399639807082;
	Fri, 09 May 2014 05:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chitra.no-ip.org ([2001:610:120:3001:2ad2:44ff:fe4a:b029])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i4sm9482736eeg.28.2014.05.09.05.50.06
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Fri, 09 May 2014 05:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 14:50:04 +0200
From: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Submodules for language bindings (was: Github?)
Message-ID: <20140509125004.GF2634@chitra.no-ip.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
	notmuch@notmuchmail.org
References:
 <CA+kKtKA8Q5z6Pys9RAumLTiJvmGwWYKGXDkKr9Mh_6ecV-7sdA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+kKtKCP8Oo2sHz5Cd0+=BmS9UK=b2h9GrGopUFwWZ=GJUXqyA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140508203019.GA2374@chitra.no-ip.org>
	<20140508212100.GD23124@vilya.m0g.net>
	<20140508220046.GB2374@chitra.no-ip.org>
	<20140508222931.GU28634@odin.tremily.us>
	<20140508224527.GC2374@chitra.no-ip.org>
	<20140508233530.GV28634@odin.tremily.us>
	<20140509113951.GD2634@chitra.no-ip.org>
	<536cccbb2aa31_771b11792f0c0@nysa.notmuch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <536cccbb2aa31_771b11792f0c0@nysa.notmuch>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1 (2013-10-16)
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 12:50:13 -0000

On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:40:27AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Suvayu Ali wrote:
> 
> > To explain my point with RPM specifics, if I were to
> > use separate spec files, python-notmuch would have:
> > 
> >   Requires: notmuch >= <version-string>
> > 
> > As you can see this only allows for tracking dependency based on
> > official version numbers.  With more bindings, many with different
> > version dependencies, this becomes quite cumbersome;
> 
> No, it doesn't:
> 
>   %package notmuch-ruby
>   Requires: notmuch = %{version}-%{release}, ruby

Doesn't that work when you have one spec file for all sub-packages (as I
do now)?  I was responding to Trevor's suggestion about not having
sub-packages, IOW, different spec files for different packages.

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.