Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2846431FD0 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 02:45:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E4ztu2FKXnBb for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 02:45:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (smtprelay04.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.31]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A18F431FB6 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 02:45:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [87.180.32.105] (helo=stokes.schwinge.homeip.net) by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1R1xeM-0002KQ-Km for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:45:30 +0200 Received: (qmail 5665 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2011 09:45:14 -0000 Received: from kepler.schwinge.homeip.net (192.168.111.7) by stokes.schwinge.homeip.net with QMQP; 9 Sep 2011 09:45:14 -0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 11338 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:45:14 -0000 From: Thomas Schwinge To: Louis Rilling , Jameson Graef Rollins Subject: Re: [PATCH] notmuch restore --accumulate In-Reply-To: <20110909090633.GA3178@localdomain> References: <1315249637-20179-1-git-send-email-thomas@schwinge.name> <87liu2kcq6.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> <20110909090633.GA3178@localdomain> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.7-57-g64222ef (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:45:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87fwk63v86.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Df-Sender: dGhvbWFzQHNjaHdpbmdlLm5hbWU= Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:45:33 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:06:34 +0200, Louis Rilling wrote: > On 05/09/11 12:31 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > > Also, we generally prefer to have modifications to the test suite in > > separate patches that precede the patches that add the features/fix the > > bugs. > >=20 >=20 > For new features, this does not look like 'git bisect'-safe. Exactly my thoughts. I can perhaps see the usefulness (for first separately committing the testcase) for bugfixes, but why for new features? > I would say that > the testsuite patch should follow the new feature patch, don't you? I would keep them together; why separate them? Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Thomas --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOaeApAAoJEGe3hdm9kOiiIZEH/1+RxSFC2zD8p5SOK4vButUz 8Va3AsKQKW6aGljVvfn/939Q3SucoKgeta7qUSP99LzxcTK96V8HttYBAxQWYwMJ nfIxjl59wEPY+3oZXnNLEaCd6L/xBbYx9yt349m5TiCYgOgboJ+iGIeZLbs6fQz8 sYyD2o3GUPfTWbYwYE2RShk/4qTQLQ3pdtkknOwx6lmlP7tLjj/oSHGzy9veWsp5 pl2usAyd3zuX3d40TZfWOJ1aPQZdKkUow/m9cXR/IHNjKFtsYIEEOJHRbsBlg+fj Gt8s+RSw/xbMUWUcY8bzSzzRwEnO6UaEDkMQPdu2EW8lgVJdFAwB9AA1FDeFOkY= =liJC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--