Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17687431FD2 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:00:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rt9Zk8Fr3WJn for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C55C5431FC9 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WZm6l-0005Lg-5x; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:59:55 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 6746 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 14 Apr 2014 18:59:50 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jameson Graef Rollins , Jani Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: sign/encrypt replies to signed/encrypted messages In-Reply-To: <87lhv7sr9z.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <87a9f1c8aq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <1396689486-19232-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org> <8738hf25pa.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <87lhv7sr9z.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.16+164~gfcbf06a (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:59:50 -0300 Message-ID: <87mwfnd9eh.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Notmuch Mail X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 19:00:07 -0000 Jameson Graef Rollins writes: > > I'd be fine with that as well. I auto-sign all outgoing mail regardless > of the signature status of what I'm replying to, so that's fine. > Auto-encrypting replies to encrypted mail is actually a security issue, > whereas auto-signing is not, so as long as we have the auto-encrypting > always enabled that should ok. > > David, did you want to handle the patch? If not let me know and I'll do > it. > > jamie. Go for it, I'm pretty busy for the next couple of days. Thanks! d