Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8894196F0 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:12:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3bfpTQhKFOc7 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:12:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E893431FC1 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:12:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=localhost.localdomain) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1NztPU-00022v-6T; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:12:48 +0000 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 500) id 97C20C00E4; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:12:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Dirk Hohndel To: Sebastian Spaeth , Notmuch list Subject: Re: RFC: User-Agent header In-Reply-To: <87iq821hba.fsf@SSpaeth.de> References: <87iq821hba.fsf@SSpaeth.de> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:12:47 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:12:49 -0000 On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:26:01 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > notmuch is (mostly) not responsible for sending email. However, people > using the emacs frontend use notmuch to create the reply. > > Am I the only one who is sometimes curious as to what mail agents others > use? Would it be useful to insert a header to notmuch reply analog to: > > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) > > We could reuse the same version string that we use for the release (or > the git string that was used to build notmuch). I can use this to create > nice stats :). > > No patch yet, just asking if this is a good idea or not. I think it's a very good idea. But it should be something that includes the other components of how you send email... Like User-Aget: Emacs 23 Message-mode / notmuch-0.1.1 /D -- Dirk Hohndel Intel Open Source Technology Center