Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2374840DDE7 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 07:39:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.149 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FH_HOST_IN_ADDRARPA=2.157, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP=1, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=no Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1uC7va91oMi2 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 07:39:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from silentio.fernseed.info (202.4.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.4.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E0BF40DDC4 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 07:39:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (bookbinder.fernseed.info [IPv6:2001:8b0:ff94:1:224:2cff:fe37:838b]) (Authenticated sender: darren) by silentio.fernseed.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5647CF8; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:39:38 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=fernseed.info; s=default; t=1289576378; bh=OJME4L9rB99914a+65+vkGg2TPNam+1iHJNmJbVxewU=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PyLi2HVFq220xU12R/eLIt69gtV7Iyo4wcmdvIY/vc47P5TbdvmBfYbxeFYKnDNnQ OyIHeR+gzmZ4nAKgdNl13zER7qpafNusBvuZ1joIWfA22lXB+V9Y8Rp3lqP+h1Q5Cb TIzhMW0rCdZaKrKzpkfukNjZzWnRoqowr9/43ARg= From: Darren McGuicken To: Matthieu Lemerre , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] How to improve the mail handling workflow? In-Reply-To: <87fwv65zw1.fsf@free.fr> References: <87fwv65zw1.fsf@free.fr> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:39:37 +0000 Message-ID: <87sjz6ft52.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:39:52 -0000 --=-=-= On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote: > Here is first a patch that copes with this last point. Whenever you > want to archive a thread, it finds whether you forgot to add a custom > "user" tag to a message, and if so asks you for a tag to add before > archiving. That way, I no longer have messages without any tags. Hmm, this would be very irritating in my own workflow in which I really only use a small number of tags on a fraction of my total mail archive to differentiate mail type or content which can't otherwise be determined from the indexed plain text of the message (I don't like to add a 'notmuch' tag to mail from the list for instance since a saved search for mail sent to the list address does exactly the same thing). I agree that the spacebar does too much if you're just using a search on the inbox tag and want something to stay visible even when you've quickly spacebar'd through a thread and archived it, but in my case that was easily solved by creating a new default saved search called 'todo' which collects unread, manually tagged 'todo' and mail matching a number of other criteria into one place. When something has been followed-up on, I remove the tag. Colouring threads using notmuch-search-line-faces is also very useful in that one-stop 'todo' view. Would any of that work for you? Why are plain text or header searches not able to find the mail you're looking for? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzdX7kACgkQP1ao/7snsT7i/QCgx7UAjGIZBYsvlF65PCZU+EPu jCQAnjm1QJbJq2/oZpeH8q5lS2B3x5h0 =Q25l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--