Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C2A431FB6 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 06:12:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.463 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP=1] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zKpK6T9I68aA for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 06:12:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net [88.164.105.66]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF10E431FB5 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 06:12:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [127.0.0.1]) by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE522C061; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:12:05 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=postfix; bh=LJ7zijZIE1K0hHYVeuOcRq +m4ow=; b=jz2Edo37IdoKmvliTLnIwAxhkb7gV7F3pJvBK65QFOizUX9kku4DFH b1gA6zXhZl4ey24qNxz2uW2q982pk1seuXTpVMQBrqupli7McfycGXGDg4J2mWaV 46B0FsoU0rrk0w2L/8pGgrj5e6l245oAGeCtzAej8j7r9VfP8DO2A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=maillard.im; h=from:to :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=postfix; b=FOAJmQXtIerTf7kB YlvJ+48xHgKkjHFS/nkQJfN+1W8WEV4jkefaRq4E4r9aeYHI0n4+/1gw5RAlGSou tylHkIIaa4Dww5eD5SaXq+O/Fc4TRHHOOabd5Z3j9vXyCvt+Kie4yRMHSUpZKlgX VzjQnGER/8Q1VxS1wv/4qHHQ210= Received: from maillard.im (unknown [192.168.0.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:12:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Xavier Maillard To: Michael Radziej , Florian Friesdorf , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages In-Reply-To: <87mxjphl55.fsf@spieleck.de> References: <8739ll8dkv.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net> <87mxjphl55.fsf@spieleck.de> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-133-gc509598 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-slackware-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:22:37 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Xavier Maillard List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:12:12 -0000 On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 00:44:06 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote: > Hi Florian! > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:03:12 +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > > Further, for certain mails I sent (like this one ) I would like a > > WAITING tag (or similar) in order to indicate that I am waiting for an > > answer. Currently I set this manually. Could this be achieved through > > some indicators via message mode or similar means? e.g.: > > I use a X-Wait header (like X-Wait: 2, meaning to wait for 2 days). If > there is no activity in the thread within time, it receives additional tags > "late" and "inbox". If an answer to a waiting mail arrives, it receives a tag "expected". I like your workflow very much. Do you think this could be done directly in a SIEVE script ? The more I use notmuch, the more I think many things could be done directly at the IMAP/SIEVE stage. Am I alone thinking this way ? I mean, today, I put things in specific folders, etc. Notmuch is almost exclusively used with search phrases like: folder:notmuch and tag:unread. I am not SIEVE expert but I am pretty sure it can do way more things than just dispatch messages into folders. /Xavier