Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A4F431FBC for ; Sat, 25 May 2013 18:28:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aq583FugzeLv for ; Sat, 25 May 2013 18:28:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98E38431FAE for ; Sat, 25 May 2013 18:28:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4Q1SMFu019211 for ; Sat, 25 May 2013 22:28:22 -0300 Received: from remotemail by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UgPl0-0004vW-Oe for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sat, 25 May 2013 22:28:22 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 17202 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 26 May 2013 01:28:16 -0000 From: david@tethera.net To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: handle CPPFLAGS in configure and make Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 22:28:10 -0300 Message-Id: <1369531693-16918-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.10.4 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 01:28:31 -0000 I wanted to enable hardening flags in the debian build (I guess other distros will want to do the same); I realized this is made more difficult by the fact that we don't handle CPPFLAGS in our build system. Well, if it makes us feel any better, CMake had (has?) the same bug.