From: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] emacs: merge overhauled
	`notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' into `notmuch'
In-Reply-To: <cunvcob52ku.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
References: <cunpqek597g.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
	<1326710551-23122-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>
	<cunvcob52ku.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+78~g6c58370 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:28:06 +0100
Message-ID: <87wr8rc2ex.fsf@praet.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Precedence: list

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:06:25 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:42:31 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:
> > CLisp'ier version of `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers', merged into `notmuch',
> > eliminating the need to hog yet another keybind.
> 
> The lisp-ier-ness changes are good.
> 
> I'm less sure about the functional change. Sometimes I want to go back
> to where I was, other times I want to go to `notmuch-hello'. [...]

Hmmm, true.  The path of least resistance is elusive.

> [...] I suppose
> that I can replace my binding for `notmuch' with one for
> `notmuch-hello'.
> 

Perhaps we could use `ido-completion-help', like Org-mode does with
`org-iswitchb' ?  OTOH, that would require an extra [RET].  Bah...

> Hmm, yes, that seems reasonable.
> 
> > FYI: causes 2 compile warnings due to requiring the cl package at runtime.
> 
> `cl' is still `eval-when-compile' though - won't that break?

Haven't noticed any issues here, apart from the complaints @ compilation.


Peace

-- 
Pieter