Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918276DE0A7F for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:22:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.697 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dOMHrpArJfeJ for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:22:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 390116DE02DD for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:22:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.30.1.75] (unknown [67.109.75.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B43C22E261; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:22:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <55A50D1D.4020204@johnnyutahh.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 08:22:37 -0500 From: Johnny Utahh User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131118 Thunderbird/17.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Does Notmuch employ a '.noupdate'-like feature? References: <55A3D81E.1000302@johnnyutahh.com> <87k2u3urce.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> In-Reply-To: <87k2u3urce.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:22:42 -0000 On 7/14/15, 2:32 AM, David Bremner wrote: > Johnny Utahh writes: > >> Does Notmuch employ a '.noupdate'-like feature? Details: >> https://github.com/djcb/mu/issues/22 >> > Maybe new.ignore (man notmuch-config) can serve roughly the same > purpose. Thanks. Will files and directories that were previously 'notmuch new' searched and newly-assigned to new.ignore still be indexed? I understand that any email messages added after said files/directories are assigned to new.ignore will not be discovered.