Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C54431FBD for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 02:21:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.438 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Ty2WymHeRhm for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 02:21:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F00F7431FBC for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 02:20:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YBhXo-0001ym-Oe; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 06:20:52 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 1325 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:20:47 -0000 From: David Bremner To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: proposal: remove support for gmime2.4 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+20~ge82bc87 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:20:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87387c9wg0.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:21:03 -0000 It seems no very recent system has gmime2.4. I guess several of these gmime2.4 only code paths are both security critical (e.g. in crypto.c) and mostly untested. Is there good reason to keep supporting gmime 2.4? d