Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F36431FAE for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:05:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.672 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.672 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.673, BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] autolearn=unavailable Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tav5OyklenMD for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:05:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from serrano.cc.columbia.edu (serrano.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.6]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F348431FBC for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:05:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from servo.finestructure.net (NYUFGA-GUESTS-01.NATPOOL.NYU.EDU [192.76.177.124]) (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0) by serrano.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1KL5dvb023801 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:05:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NiwWB-0001QL-8F; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:05:39 -0500 From: Jameson Rollins To: Carl Worth Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:05:35 -0500 Message-ID: <87ocjjhb34.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-No-Spam-Score: Local X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.6 Cc: Notmuch Mail Subject: [notmuch] patch queue X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:05:42 -0000 --=-=-= Hey, Carl. I've noticed that you've been applying some patches that were recently sent to the list, out of order from the chronological queue of patches that were sent to the list. I'm a fan of the recently applied patches, but I'm curious about what your plans are for the older patches in the quene. Are you still planning on processing them? Should the older patches be rebased against the current master and resent? I'm not at all trying to be pushy; there's just some older stuff in the queue that I would really like to see applied, such as folder-based tagging, json output, and some of the emacs UI improvements. Thanks so much for the info. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLgE6fAAoJEO00zqvie6q8iHIP/3QcIbxYwOVBueCh32uc85Ks l6ewMt+f22HccxeMCPEgujX5muLJxXc3cl81R/GRRqNrAlWhdmaWtycceYuvhOBB jva4ekMAVnR2JtADtPZwBvIU6GRjIPTNFTn2cSMMxXmk0YVUPkS2E3VqluhW04V7 dVMdHWAdSz5gCOnmcbDD+jqQ2pc9OGDi75VWOR/qkIQ/PEN7fHXClOhY362BW67U 5Gh56MbYWSPUZnpBndes4LkEKy8nKUZT+dH1RFxzRmgc+wxdDYiX38QgvCpQTiLc J/mKw04wNRZIVjNU103f2rdcdYCIp7zncST0J/1PT+9xS4E5mxCN0coiZWoS0UvB 4AThvgc6j8jwebkJHp21dcNpbtGTA3hpjAPrT5kn1S9RQ+uYzPeg7vCYvmbzs5vF vVNo3ruHElFdD9aui8/zN/FwnqB8gG+lK0Yo/i2hZUKChwLU3Sct/TuhjYigQKOw zfjYqy2DeP3blUEv/dan0NDh7zImCUU2pngevIXpCLMLsNblweNJIcEjH+HxoUtL QkRMfPID8zB3dKSGB2FehjvjD/RA1lcV2qlrvRZ5h0rP7kmldYkZ5Lw0yO8k85zD DML9yrp0SBz2/bAX8hlP08R0+cfeWCv9gujs2ofKTYRYHRbHbkc9z+7yIm0akzfZ AyOlLSb+aOVM/3qs+VhW =CUva -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--