Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B16431FBD for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:21:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xUJe-jsBWkvy for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F9A431FAF for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8552E50AC5; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:21:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from finestructure.net (pool-108-27-62-184.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [108.27.62.184]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id E457A2E508D7; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:21:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C6968573; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:21:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: Adam Wolfe Gordon , Mark Walters Subject: Re: Reply code with TEXT/PLAIN In-Reply-To: References: <87d3814qkv.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+335~gf868783 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:21:21 -0700 Message-ID: <8762drl766.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:21:29 -0000 --=-=-= On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:19:50 -0600, Adam Wolfe Gordon wrote: > A bit of Googling indicates that MIME types should be case insensitive > (i.e. TEXT/PLAIN should match text/plain). Given this, I think it > makes sense to change the emacs function regardless of whether it > makes sense for the CLI to output them in lower-case. Does it make sense for the cli to canonicalize the content types to always be lower case? Or should it continue to just pass the content type exactly as it appears in the original message? Given that consumers should parse it case insensitively, it maybe doesn't matter, but it might also be nice for us to be consistent. Maybe it's just ok as it is. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPcIlxAAoJEO00zqvie6q8p7IQAK6Jku8cTtQjSAC8kCl59BEk qoLfQhAi6n2PNmYTVQvoAjSCLoToAHFfeXVkEseVr+vPc0cZb5jGA+mbGdWQzGjw 8fYXvk9fEDT/Q0BB7/8UF0fIiV2Ezn0SHvajVobBoeW6XGvOmlL98ik7xJIfKtGd +A+noMFk+r4R+sszx4AtFnKKIcc5Sgpl8DcJ8IplS4mUkmiEA+HeezHlkOz7ro1J N8oXDQqyLLeuc3W5Q771kUTdUhFQOmN5W46OjUcd78BIB/b5RNchgB191sTFJFxq +ikuSxggiFsbmEA/eUFLCftyUtZnkNYeI/Bol1OulmxWYoVwyApmdwRmOnaGd/mA P5BYqOC6sWg6pwCgvUqH3KAOrtPoTFMxqb/mcBeqxCHIr6SUOxJJMtB4tAsizZZD XDgDhxvUjM/1MPwroey32/3eoqUM4nPewdmfUF32VyNqp0gh0L5co4/ajtR8voyZ N+uD5qERYcH/uq4GyP/bv/lNoy+HRwZlKJCeJuy+Fzi/c4JI9npOON+3EAgwcyD2 CEX5jtK859aMTsrFajm0Uy3ZyFBmiFCpq5r2wAfKWTfs3BcG13gu4YRUay5c1xrT ruF35aTy3McL1HzsaWeAfWJV1zjMZ7GL22I9Z4RtATzcWJOrIIni+D7m9AYLx2BM W1VXHS6mFZ9eQmX30iU8 =/n9n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--