Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6BC429E5B for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:55:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sz74dTeikVx0 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:55:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru-group.fi [87.108.86.66]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9056429E34 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:55:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2255168056; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:55:16 +0200 (EET) From: Tomi Ollila To: David Edmondson , Dmitry Kurochkin , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] emacs: If archiving the last message in a thread, show the next thread. In-Reply-To: References: <1327996914-9644-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> <1327996914-9644-2-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> <871uqgntjz.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+146~geb6dc33 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:55:14 -0000 On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:30:20 +0000, David Edmondson wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:25:36 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > > I like David's alternative suggestion (in IRC) where cursor is left at > > the end of buffer in case last message is archived with 'a'. > > Unless the cursor is already at the end of the buffer, in which case it > would do the 'next thread' dance (i.e. it behaves like 'space' in that > respect). I think I (and Jameson) don't want that behaviour -- therefore we need functionality (somewhat) analogous to this: (defun notmuch-show-advance-and-archive () "..." (interactive) (if (notmuch-show-advance) (notmuch-show-archive-thread-then-next))) So we can easily rebind to the version which doesn't do the '...then-next' magic... Tomi