Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF396DE0A4A for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 06:27:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.095] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wh86KYxhfHdR for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 06:27:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from gitolite.debian.net (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF49B6DE024C for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 06:27:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by gitolite.debian.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvnOs-0006AC-2Y; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:26:26 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 19858 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:26:11 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Michal Sojka , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Fix regression in (notmuch-)message-mode initialization In-Reply-To: <87bnb38hg3.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> References: <1446573161-28068-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> <87d1vj4b9z.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87bnb38hg3.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+5~gca076ce (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:26:11 -0400 Message-ID: <87h9kvgsfw.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:27:16 -0000 Michal Sojka writes: >> I think we might be better off in the long run replacing the call to >> message-mail. Code duplication is obviously not great, but perhaps some >> of the complexity of message-mail / message-pop-to-buffer can be >> eliminated, since we don't need to support all of the use cases of >> message-mail. > > OK. I'll try implement notmuch-message-mail as a simpler alternative to > message-mail. Let's see how it will look like. Thanks for giving it a try. David