Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031BB6DE00CB for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:18:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.116 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.116 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.116] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rldSwAPW3Uhc for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:18:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gitolite.debian.net (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB2646DE005F for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by gitolite.debian.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZWN3s-0002jJ-Hj; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:15:40 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 17732 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:15:19 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Tomi Ollila , Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] cli: add support for deduplicating based on case insensitive address In-Reply-To: References: <874mjht1y6.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+60~gcb08a2e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:15:19 -0300 Message-ID: <87io7vso8o.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:18:59 -0000 Tomi Ollila writes: >> I can live with the current argument syntax, but since a certain a mount >> of bikeshedding is expected, here is an alternative suggestion >> >> --deduplication={none|mailbox|address} > > (is s/deduplicate/deduplication/ intended or accidental change?) accidental. hmm. well, --deduplicate={no|mailbox|address} is a few characters shorter. > Is this complete alternative to --deduplicate={no|yes|address}, > respectively? Yes