Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:30:11 -0700
From: Ian Main <imain@redhat.com>
To: Franz Fellner <alpine.art.de@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <544046f358233_2c291569e8c76@ovo.mains.priv.notmuch>
In-Reply-To: <20141016144109.GB3471@TP_L520.localdomain>
References: <543ecf59e21b8_2c291569e8c7e@ovo.mains.priv.notmuch>
	<20141016144109.GB3471@TP_L520.localdomain>
Subject: Re: notmuch vim patches
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Precedence: list

Franz Fellner wrote:
> 
>  
> > I'm starting to realize that I could default to using 'enter' to both
> > open URI's and view attachments.  Any other ideas welcome.
> 
> - make some of the functions public so users can bind them to keys they
>   want
> - introduce show_[prev,next]_unread_msg, probably factor out
>   "show_scroll_to_msg()" and implement prev/next msg with that?

You know I was just reading a thread and hit 'a' to archive a message
within the thread and for some reason it hung for a few seconds.. but it
made me think we should be able to press 'a' (or whatever archive key)
and have it archive and move to next unread.  That seems to me to be a
good behavior with a natural flow.

    Ian

> - use proper buffers instead of Scratch buffers, so BufExplorer also
>   shows notmuch-vim buffers
> - folding of messages; add option to fold read messages by default.
> 
> I think I can implement the second point (if you not already did
> that).
> I also looked into folding, but my knowledge of all the possiblities is
> not that good (manual folding markers look ugly, don't know if/how 'syntax'
> will work; and IMHO the user's shortcuts for folding should still work).
> 
> Franz
> _______________________________________________
> notmuch mailing list
> notmuch@notmuchmail.org
> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch