Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457B4429E43 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:23:18 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G4nCxr3pe-Mm for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:23:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CECF3429E42 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:23:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxlNY-00059y-FA; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:23:08 +0000 Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223] helo=localhost) by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RxlNY-0007cZ-0o; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:23:04 +0000 From: Mark Walters To: Tomi Ollila , Adam Wolfe Gordon , Dmitry Kurochkin Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Add the option of counting threads in notmuch-hello In-Reply-To: References: <1329319688-16056-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> <87bop0gklt.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+206~g3b67774 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:24:27 +0000 Message-ID: <8762f7etfo.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) X-QM-Body-MD5: 2ab3a7d21402b6fafb6f8e16a591476b (of first 20000 bytes) X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: - X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to determine if it is spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. This message scored -1.8 points. Summary of the scoring: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay * domain * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:23:18 -0000 On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:14:19 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:23:31 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:52, Dmitry Kurochkin > > wrote: > > > Can we delay this patch until user-defined sections are pushed? =C2= =A0I know > > > I promised to review it long ago. =C2=A0But I still did not manage to= finish > > > it yet. =C2=A0I hope I can do it in the beginning of the next week. > >=20 > > Absolutely. I was just building new notmuch packages for myself this > > morning and realized I had this commit sitting in my tree collecting > > dust. >=20 > notmuch count is fast > notmuch count --output=3Dthreads is slower >=20 > I was thinking why not show both? but as threads > count is slow there could be customization variable > for showing *optionally* thread count in addition=20 > to message count like >=20 > "You have nn,nnn messages in n,nnn threads" At the risk of reducing this to bikeshedding I would prefer an option to disable the counts totally: even counting messages is annoyingly slow. Maybe this will all be fixed by the user-defined sections patch though. Best wishes Mark