Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14436431FBC for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:42:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h7YNzXdJvi8H for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:42:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pivot.cs.unb.ca (pivot.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.57]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534C0431FAE for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:42:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-142167182194.pppoe-dynamic.high-speed.nb.bellaliant.net ([142.167.182.194] helo=localhost) by pivot.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NJz0y-00066C-Vo; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:42:17 -0400 Received: from bremner by localhost with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NJz0p-0001aa-VN; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:42:07 -0400 From: David Bremner To: Scott Robinson , notmuch In-Reply-To: <1260749055-sup-6010@lisa> References: <87iqcapijl.fsf@pivot.cs.unb.ca> <87hbrupib9.fsf@pivot.cs.unb.ca> <1260749055-sup-6010@lisa> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:42:07 -0400 Message-ID: <87eimypesg.fsf@pivot.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender-Verified: bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca Subject: Re: [notmuch] RFC: output json from notmuch? X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:42:19 -0000 On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:05:07 -0800, Scott Robinson wrote: > I have a patch for a --output=(text|json) for both notmuch-show and > notmuch-search. I mentioned it earlier on the list, and no one seemed to have > any interest. Ahh, I missed that. I think it was just before I subscribed to the list, and I skipped over the subject about perl and python. > Is it worth updating to HEAD and trying again? Sure, it sounds more complete than what I have. You could also wait and see what feedback this thread gathers. On a different topic (and in response to Carl and your earlier discussion), as a counter-weight to the desire to avoid dependencies (which I agree with), I also think we should be careful about how many embedded copies of code there are, from the point of keeping up with security problems. This is probably a bias I picked up from Debian. -- David Bremner Professor, UNB Computer Science bremner@unb.ca http://www.cs.unb.ca/~bremner Cross Appointment, UNB Mathematics http://www.mitacs.ca/ MITACS Atlantic Scientific Director