Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49D6431FBF for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:19:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zZLDRBn1sH0i for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:19:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9BF2431FBD for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:19:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WPewO-0002xs-7M; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 18:19:24 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 22705 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:19:19 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jani Nikula , Jameson Graef Rollins , Notmuch list Subject: Re: WARNING: database upgrade coming In-Reply-To: <87a9cood0l.fsf@nikula.org> References: <874n37a017.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87txawkam3.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87a9cood0l.fsf@nikula.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+133~g5348d19 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 18:19:19 -0300 Message-ID: <87eh20v7zc.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:19:37 -0000 Jani Nikula writes: > > FWIW it should always be safe to interrupt the upgrade; I know we don't > inform the user about this. > With that in mind, would it be reasonable/worthwhile to print a 5 second (or so) countdown before running the upgrade? But then people who run it non-interactively would still automagically get the upgrade, just 5 seconds later. d