Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2237D431FBC for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:57:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.512 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.512 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.513, BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jVHfiJuc9l2M for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:57:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from homiemail-a12.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaid.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.83]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914F9431FAE for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:57:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from sspaeth.de (unknown [195.190.178.84]) by homiemail-a12.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6C7B2714058; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:57:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:57:06 +0100 From: "Sebastian Spaeth" To: Tim Stoakes , James Vasile In-Reply-To: <20100225013036.GE3940@mail.stoakes.net> References: <87635mwgke.wl%james@hackervisions.org> <20100225013036.GE3940@mail.stoakes.net> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:57:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87d3ztbn25.fsf@SSpaeth.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: notmuch Subject: Re: [notmuch] envelope-to X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:57:14 -0000 On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:00:37 +1030, Tim Stoakes wrote: > > I get a lot of BCC mail. The envelope-to is a good way for me to know > > which of my various addresses was BCC'd. > > I'm very new here, but I think the answer is 'no' - notmuch only seems > to index a few headers. Which is a pity - I use an extensive system of > X-Label headers, and would like to convert them to notmuch tags - I just > can't seem to do it. I hope I'm wrong. It's not yet possible, but it's on Carl's list of required features. I want my spam headers being recognized as well. :-) Sebastian