Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280AF431FAF for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:23:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dcGpQLqrt3-M for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:23:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (mail-ww0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90518431FAE for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:23:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by wgbdt11 with SMTP id dt11so91468wgb.2 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:22:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.103.2 with SMTP id fs2mr47583485wib.21.1327015379363; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:22:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([109.131.97.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dm10sm2881003wib.4.2012.01.19.15.22.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:22:59 -0800 (PST) From: Pieter Praet To: Aaron Ecay , Austin Clements Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Quote MML tags in replies In-Reply-To: References: <1326998589-37187-1-git-send-email-aaronecay@gmail.com> <20120119224842.GS16740@mit.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+99~gab86e73 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:21:08 +0100 Message-ID: <87obtzuvmj.fsf@praet.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:23:01 -0000 On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:56:16 -0500, Aaron Ecay wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:48:42 -0500, Austin Clements wr= ote: > > Did you consider using point-max instead of mark? IIRC, that mark was > > very recently introduced which, perhaps irrationally, makes it seem > > less future-proof to me. >=20 > Well, if the patch goes in and someone changes the code so that it no > longer sets the mark (in the same way), they will be the one breaking > stuff, and they=E2=80=99ll have to come up with the fix themself. [...] True that. > [...] Using point-max > would include the signature in the quoting as well. It would probably be > fairly odd to want to put an MML tag in one=E2=80=99s signature, but that= doesn=E2=80=99t > mean that we should break that usage. >=20 So, would I be right to assume MML tags in signatures are never evaluated to begin with? Otherwise, there would still be a security hole, no? > >=20 > > >=20=20 > > > (defun notmuch-mua-forward-message () > > > (message-forward) > >=20 > > Speaking of future-proofing, it would be good to have a test. >=20 > It would. ;) I=E2=80=99ll work on one. >=20 Thanks! These might save you some time: id:"1310313335-4159-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org" > --=20 > Aaron Ecay > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch Peace --=20 Pieter