Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA21431FB6 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:35:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m1Ed-aO4vFVC for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:35:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bw0-f52.google.com (mail-bw0-f52.google.com [209.85.214.52]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED0E431FB5 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:35:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so4691229bwz.39 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:35:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=g+poJF5gXuX4xyW5+Ox/MHbPy1Wms9uM3cGOZccGaKA=; b=Z0N/SmMPdk5RtGX2iu3jdgjJ/SkWMyfgFlhXs9yshR3cFm9st7BGAoIpOXey5azfEP jouGgHbbM5BF4nFK84XH38JSlvOBsbLDSb6lK75DLlWRdwGjgmmkZtFHQzmeOdDa3be3 PxeVp4gx/V/OIO3spUVO8rDEKwqmJYIoyMqwE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=VAYPeAU6MlQmWsRwEZxoKQOSLxIsPUTzMjcWJLX7U5xtja6PVfQHYeJEiXHpUzY8kF vW4cpnDcxDmqLZOHTMWXNXVJIfLuUDHwEkRyweW3GjTGSIVfO5PYBjmtUaL628KI83mi eyD6WQWl/NdTLV7IzL6a9DjGiE8pzhhOOTNTU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.85.10 with SMTP id m10mr869569bkl.156.1291995317195; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:35:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.60.20 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:35:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <877hfi1ql7.fsf@SSpaeth.de> References: <1291933972-7186-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <877hfi1ql7.fsf@SSpaeth.de> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:35:17 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] composing patches From: Felipe Contreras To: Sebastian Spaeth Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:35:21 -0000 On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:32:49 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> I don't know how it works in gnus, but at least on the vim mode, the output >> generated by 'notmuch reply' is not ready to be sent, at least the Message-ID >> field is needed, and also is nice to have the User-Agent. > > But notmuch is not the User-Agent. That's why the emacs UI fills in the > User-Agent value itself. I am not sure on the policy of creating > Message-IDs, perhaps notmuch-reply could actually fill in some defaults there. Why it's not? The emacs UI is not really doing anything on top of 'notmuch reply'. And if it is, it can very well override that value. Besides, what about other users (vim)? Why not make the output of 'notmuch reply' ready to be dumped to sendmail? It seems right now there's a lot of reliance on emacs UI, and gnus. -- Felipe Contreras