Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9774196F2
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.89
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]
	autolearn=ham
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id Q0h8hNxcvArf; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932AB431FC1;
	Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 47629568DEB; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
To: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>,
	Notmuch developer list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rename already used counter var i
In-Reply-To: <87r5m1lyj5.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
References: <87tyqxmdw6.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<1272373045-29268-1-git-send-email-Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
	<87r5m1lyj5.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-251-g8514e59 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1
	(i486-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:18:30 -0700
Message-ID: <87zl0olspl.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:18:32 -0000

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:57:25 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.d=
e> wrote:
> For a point release like 0.3.1 I'm going to insist on a test case that
> demonstrates each regression being fixed. Does someone know what it
> takes to make a mail trigger this bug?

I investigated this. The key was that the user had to have no configured
"other" email addresses, (or at least fewer than the fixed-length array
(2) being iterated over in the outer loop) in order to trigger the
infinite-loop bug.

I just pushed new test cases to master that pass, and verified that the
same test cases cause the code in 0.3 to enter an infinite loop.

=2DCarl

=2D-=20
carl.d.worth@intel.com

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFL1xxm6JDdNq8qSWgRAkRKAJ9iUW2gqQTCbV3oPnOC0JKMvD24rACbBsfC
PewaUdt7qVYl8moJ5D2Ghkg=
=zHo6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--