Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC6C431FBF
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  9 May 2014 21:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.799
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
	FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id gVnXxmdOwhna for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Fri,  9 May 2014 21:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f180.google.com (mail-ie0-f180.google.com
	[209.85.223.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 274F9431FBC
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  9 May 2014 21:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id as1so4976697iec.11
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 09 May 2014 21:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=1MRJx7aJo6cy5z9/WehyiJwtmpNaiqfUZ7Ic5MnhrO8=;
	b=I6GduRrONPf/dKGqvT5WyIT0B099Y6Ci8no3Ls0G+Lz5K1lFY6VG/n+eUgd92254mW
	B6V7Z4cxDxAg/2joo7m1ibesyNvddUk2PeMd4ChZyf4SJ1XjCbyfLqhOhGewP5DN74GU
	wG5qDrOUdFfGxrKQxZE0+Uy5X8fRrr2dn8ImjMv9aDl2n4Vzc4v8jFxWWKvpcV4CUg3a
	pQ2RXchNAnja0FxAoqFPN3Yjz+SZ4j1W4ddcAvLq3+R4ILvvs1wM1ivKDJLUK4t81lSZ
	qGKC46QhP9R30Rct8WYzEfVB/w1pfVE1z4V/Y/ZQXjT5uvzF664bltvpKGeD8QqqQYNe
	Xr6A==
X-Received: by 10.50.43.170 with SMTP id x10mr17337288igl.36.1399694493625;
	Fri, 09 May 2014 21:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (189-211-224-40.static.axtel.net. [189.211.224.40])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hi8sm3773090igb.8.2014.05.09.21.01.31
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Fri, 09 May 2014 21:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 23:01:28 -0500
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, =?UTF-8?B?WMSrY8Oy?= <xico@atelo.org>
Message-ID: <536da4982095d_1ed7ae930416@nysa.notmuch>
In-Reply-To: <874n0y5qo5.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
References: <20140506194025.GA17097@coyotlan.Tlalpan>
	<m2mweuhcna.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
	<87lhucv5b8.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
	<m2r442oh5j.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
	<87a9aq5ulz.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
	<20140510015338.GA1080@coyotlan.atelo.org>
	<874n0y5qo5.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
Subject: Re: pkg-config zlib check in 3c13bc
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 04:02:01 -0000

David Bremner wrote:
> X=C4=ABc=C3=B2 <xico@atelo.org> writes:
> > As a side note, is there any rationale for the hand-made configure? N=
ot
> > that I am a big fan of autoconf/cmake/whatever either...
> =

> Carl Worth had a lot of (negative) experience with autoconf when he
> started the project, which motivated him to roll his own.  Personally I=

> don't really think any of the alternatives are convincingly better than=

> autoconf. Of course it's one of those very subjective things.

I think Makefiles are superior to autoconf. What we have is fine.

-- =

Felipe Contreras=