Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7EE4431FD4
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.699
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
	autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id COsJIk2ROvo4 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com
	[209.85.212.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E71D0431FBD
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id q5so799644wiv.0
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent
	:from:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
	bh=CvPxfAyZwUOCMAD9ZAk4xH0difA4Ide/JbnEl5m0WIo=;
	b=bzUktifxjK1fI8tofHlUtCBPsZhBRvUWtdTkP3ERgEsqovvVYgtssiYLsovWPgzM6C
	bCSFqFsm8T13DlYjCFZGMXJJTY3ugU0Np1PmdWEbHvqbMhcpbkFflKsRMODhZX6EWT8c
	lkYH9l4Uj/O95xhapj7ew4gFKCJZmVql3Hu7QRH275hu1L+EO9M0lV6okJzrVQzt0rK5
	laIKsb/P+vqyFU8yeI1UPuOW77JvyWsgIPkpH4WzR28WXOOWNBr6ae3ljPk/QpwUgQPG
	yEr0VaIDsrvQFvoLnzeOUhP/Kq05g3LTjnmgraDhs0ggz13PvlXjLmYDMlL0dwPipjhs
	hV3A==
X-Gm-Message-State:
 ALoCoQnJzJXImGbgZ3zuK8t4mwM4EPp0giiJHThgchALLn9sqEbfZnvADwEKBGOdDdmropKX3GUy
X-Received: by 10.194.205.103 with SMTP id lf7mr1159214wjc.134.1414146117159; 
	Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net
	([2a01:348:1a2:1:ea39:35ff:fe2c:a227])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q10sm5114251wjq.35.2014.10.24.03.21.55
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (30000@localhost [local]);
	by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 235a0763;
	Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:21:54 +0000 (UTC)
To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] search: Seperately report matching and
	non-matching	authors.
In-Reply-To: <87y4s5vn12.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
References: <1414140488-29978-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
	<1414140488-29978-2-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
	<87y4s5vn12.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
	(x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0)
From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:21:54 +0100
Message-ID: <m24mut4vjx.fsf@heart-of-gold.hh.sledj.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:27:43 -0000

On Fri, Oct 24 2014, Mark Walters wrote:
> What about having both authors_matched and authors_not_matched as lists
> of authors (ie one string for each author)?

That's a sensible idea. I will look into it.

> Then emacs, for example, wouldn't try and parse the string back into
> authors before splitting.

It doesn't really do that other than to decide where to truncate the
visible string. That whole chunk of code is horrible.

>>  	first_non_matched_author = 0;
>
> I think I would prefer to make this look like the matched case and drop
> the first_non_matched_author stuff.

Agreed, will do.