Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD9E431FBD for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 373igepBmwIT for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:51:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-f178.google.com (mail-vc0-f178.google.com [209.85.220.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC9CA431FBC for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:51:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id im17so7725830vcb.23 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:51:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=vW3WQ9YPYD+1T6IcJ0ADqVa5Sg7mQt7NZDQX7x/boDw=; b=b39xzwrCv8iK2yx467vPMJojkv+26LFIy5oYqlvNHb3q7lJkvTUiTqIVBa3KYRYUj9 GbNQMbxo4tyyQdD8cehzhK8chOohpQh+Ay0PEwdtKR7A2RO671UI2viLX50/EmNw7gz9 0KjTUt02jrUvQi09gFHuZG2AJpS/ph9Hz5LbhFP/RMliIQCjX9ePbdB029G0r9CqrXdx HI/ly7s3Z4JGjOMEyK5ywJ1ds9m8yNPr77dp1h36QXWFIlE6JFj4j5OKyZ/JwzC67LEU QBZtEfsCFUOLurvnXz+URaGU2fHJuHJ60bnOipLLVTw7URYDDmKK8+aZEPJ7NA2nlKMo a/jQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm5mVdT6PTGFQP3Ibvq+I3UVmQn7d7jSiwHvfp1eYhsCawZdiHgfuyJrmsODY4rAzsqKPUo MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.92.135 with SMTP id r7mr37624586vcm.11.1397497895097; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:51:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.171.65 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:51:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.171.65 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:51:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8738hf25pa.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> References: <87a9f1c8aq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <1396689486-19232-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org> <8738hf25pa.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 20:51:35 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: sign/encrypt replies to signed/encrypted messages From: Jani Nikula To: David Bremner Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b66f5fb9caa6104f7045533 Cc: Notmuch Mail X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:51:43 -0000 --047d7b66f5fb9caa6104f7045533 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Apr 14, 2014 10:17 AM, "David Bremner" wrote: > > Jani Nikula writes: > > +(defun notmuch-mua-reply-crypto (parts) > > + (loop for part in parts > > + if (notmuch-match-content-type (plist-get part :content-type) "multipart/signed") > > + do (mml-secure-message-sign) > > How do people feel about disabling/removing the previous two lines? > I'd be fine with that (see the commit message). Jani. > It's less obvious to me that you always want to sign in reply to a > signed message (probably you want to unconditionally always sign in that > case). As written this causes some inconvenience for users that have > notmuch-crypto-process-mime=t to verify inbound signatures, but don't > necessarily have the ability to sign outbound mail. > > > > + else if (notmuch-match-content-type (plist-get part :content-type) "multipart/encrypted") > > + do (mml-secure-message-sign-encrypt) > > + else if (notmuch-match-content-type (plist-get part :content-type) "multipart/*") > > + do (notmuch-mua-reply-crypto (plist-get part :content)))) > > + --047d7b66f5fb9caa6104f7045533 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Apr 14, 2014 10:17 AM, "David Bremner" <david@tethera.net> wrote:
>
> Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org= > writes:
> > +(defun notmuch-mua-reply-crypto (parts)
> > + =C2=A0(loop for part in parts
> > + =C2=A0 =C2=A0 if (notmuch-match-content-type (plist-get part :c= ontent-type) "multipart/signed")
> > + =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 do (mml-secure-message-sign)
>
> How do people feel about disabling/removing the previous two lines? >

I'd be fine with that (see the commit message).

Jani.

> It's less obvious to me that you always want to sig= n in reply to a
> signed message (probably you want to unconditionally always sign in th= at
> case). =C2=A0As written this causes some inconvenience =C2=A0for users= that have
> notmuch-crypto-process-mime=3Dt to verify inbound signatures, but don&= #39;t
> necessarily have the ability to sign outbound mail.
>
>
> > + =C2=A0 =C2=A0 else if (notmuch-match-content-type (plist-get pa= rt :content-type) "multipart/encrypted")
> > + =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 do (mml-secure-message-sign-encrypt)
> > + =C2=A0 =C2=A0 else if (notmuch-match-content-type (plist-get pa= rt :content-type) "multipart/*")
> > + =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 do (notmuch-mua-reply-crypto (plist-get pa= rt :content))))
> > +

--047d7b66f5fb9caa6104f7045533--