Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2846DE02AD for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 17:50:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.013 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.013 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.002, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aDXyc7_M3Hbi for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 17:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A87186DE01BE for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 17:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ax23Z-00070d-9J; Sun, 01 May 2016 20:49:49 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 19583 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 02 May 2016 00:49:51 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Tomi Ollila , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Cc: tomi.ollila@iki.fi Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: copyright information updates In-Reply-To: <1460736374-10238-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> References: <1460736374-10238-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+99~gd93d377 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 21:49:51 -0300 Message-ID: <87y47t707k.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 00:50:03 -0000 Tomi Ollila writes: > # Copyright (c) 2005 Junio C Hamano > +# Copyright (c) 2010-today Notmuch Developers I don't what to think about this. The convention I am familiar with for date ranges is roughly that documented here: https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Copyright-Notices.html The tl;dr is that the years or ranges document the last significant change. On the other hand, I'd say most notmuch code has the copyright date it is created, and that is never changed. So I'd say go with creation date, or some actual date ranges that we will probably forget to update. OK, I agree it's nit picky. But it's a nit picky patch ;). d