Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023CE4196F3 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:43:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J+nctOpXaJQW for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:43:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.155]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2DA431FC1 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:43:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so3498540fga.2 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:43:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.99.78 with SMTP id t14mr49610fan.85.1271947272726; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:41:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ut.hh.sledj.net (gmp-ea-fw-1.sun.com [192.18.1.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 2sm3520135fks.42.2010.04.22.07.41.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:41:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ut.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D2AD2594118; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:41:05 +0100 (BST) To: Servilio Afre Puentes Subject: Re: pull request In-Reply-To: References: <87sk722sfq.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> <87eiibq22s.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> <87iq7kjz7c.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87aasvk6tx.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-20-g89ec2c1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: David Edmondson Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:41:05 +0100 Message-ID: <871ve7k0se.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: notmuch X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:43:05 -0000 On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:10:15 -0400, Servilio Afre Puentes wrote: > > Showing only one (with a variable allowing you to express preference) is > > my intention. Any non-shown parts will appear as attachments - you can > > save them using the button (and perhaps later view them). > > Why not see them in-line if possible? This will probably come later, sure. At the moment the entire buffer is built in one pass before you see it. If we want to support the insertion of parts 'on demand' then a little more work is required. > >> What I miss in this view sometimes is the possibility of being able to > >> see the structure of the thread. A way to toggle the expanded state of > >> the messages originally expanded when I first opened the view would do > >> this very nicely. > > > > Ah, so you want a "go back to how it was initially" command? > > Yep, then bind it to a key that would alternate between collapsing all > messages and expanding the ones that were originally expanded. I'll give this some thought. dme. -- David Edmondson, http://dme.org