Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76846431FBD for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:21:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gnuXrF8v2DrE for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:21:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DE54431FB6 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:21:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W6q3u-0006dO-LN; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:21:22 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 8122 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 24 Jan 2014 23:21:18 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Austin Clements , Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] lib: make folder: prefix literal In-Reply-To: <87y525m649.fsf@awakening.csail.mit.edu> References: <87y525m649.fsf@awakening.csail.mit.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+35~g3b36898 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:21:18 -0400 Message-ID: <874n4totjl.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 23:21:35 -0000 Austin Clements writes: > On Thu, 09 Jan 2014, Jani Nikula wrote: > > I strongly disagree with requiring the cur/new component. The cur/new > directory is an internal implementation detail of Maildir (and a rather > broken one at that) and no more a part of the "folder" of a piece of > mail than its final file name component. It's also the less obvious > user interface; if we require the cur/new component, we *will* get > people asking why their folder searches aren't working, but if we strip > the cur/new component, nobody will be surprised. > My gut instinct agrees with Austin here, at least for a prefix named "folder". Some factors I remember - are there some corner cases for people not using Maildir? - isn't there some information encoded in whether a message is in cur or new? there was some discussion of mutt presenting this information d