Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3E6431FBF for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 23:37:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y2KNKzt5ITU0 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 23:37:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F382431FB6 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 23:37:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XaIyE-0002EX-O0; Sat, 04 Oct 2014 03:37:34 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 10415 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 04 Oct 2014 06:37:24 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Austin Clements , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: Port atomicity test to Python In-Reply-To: <1412355483-7670-1-git-send-email-aclements@csail.mit.edu> References: <1412355483-7670-1-git-send-email-aclements@csail.mit.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+98~gae27403 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 08:37:24 +0200 Message-ID: <878ukwqr17.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Austin Clements X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 06:37:40 -0000 Austin Clements writes: > > Hi Amadeusz. Does this patch fix the problem for you? I don't have > GDB 7.8, so I can't test against it, but the Python interface is less > fragile than the GDB scripting language. (Even if this doesn't fix > your problem, I think we should switch to the Python interface.) I can confirm this new version runs with gdb 7.8 (and python3) on debian. I also runs with gdb 7.7.1+dfsg-3 and python2. > + shutil.copytree('%s/.notmuch' % maildir, '%s.snap/.notmuch' % maildir) I hesitate to have an opinion on python style, but for whatever reason I have a mild preference for str.format(args) versus str % args. Not enough of a preference to redo the patch. I also agree that this version is easier to follow than the one it replaces.