Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3E6429E5B for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uM+eP90l32MJ for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com (mail-ww0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF3F2429E54 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by wgbdt12 with SMTP id dt12so2312204wgb.2 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.93.168 with SMTP id cv8mr12569697wib.2.1327305607566; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.149.164.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ho4sm11461009wib.3.2012.01.23.00.00.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 30000) id E2023A0950; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:00:03 +0000 (GMT) To: Jameson Graef Rollins , Austin Clements , Dmitry Kurochkin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: Make the part content available to the mm-inline* checks. In-Reply-To: <8739bam8si.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <1326907993-11054-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> <1326908371-11949-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> <877h0o99aj.fsf@gmail.com> <874nvs96ps.fsf@gmail.com> <20120118193501.GG16740@mit.edu> <8739bam8si.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+73~gd51b784 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.92.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: David Edmondson Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:00:00 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:00:09 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:13:49 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:35:01 -0500, Austin Clements wr= ote: > > Shouldn't we only be doing this for parts with inline (or not > > attachment) content-disposition? That's cheap to check. Or do we > > actually want things like image attachments to get inlined, despite > > their disposition? >=20 > This is a good question, actually. Should we just always ignore the > disposition, and inline stuff if it's inlinable? Should this be > configurable? We shouldn't inline things unless the content disposition is 'inline'. I'll work on a fix for this, which will have nothing to do with whether or not things are indexed. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk8dE4AACgkQaezQq/BJZRZnxwCfameJCIEUcirade8CECFgN93W Z4UAmweopixrwfRG8QWmJ3PvKSamqduN =C4Ix -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--