Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B37431FB6 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:31:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EMCNDE+EsEkI for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6A66431FAE for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WwH50-0003jI-Kx; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 17:31:06 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 24213 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:31:02 -0000 From: David Bremner To: David Edmondson , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] emacs: Forwarded messages should not have modified buffers In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18+13~g1adde01 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 17:31:02 -0300 Message-ID: <87wqch5309.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:31:22 -0000 David Edmondson writes: > When the user begins forwarding a message, the resulting composition > buffer should not be marked as modified, in order that it can > immediately be killed without prompting. It seems the quoted-printable encoding of that message (at least delivered to me) prevents applying that patch. Would you mind redoing it, possibly without signing it? cheers, d