Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2888A4048D2 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:00:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.595 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.410, BAYES_40=-0.185] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zSDKBCQY96sV for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:00:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from homiemail-a11.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbef.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.145]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D454048D0 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:00:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from sspaeth.de (unknown [84.55.211.9]) by homiemail-a11.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EA01B194074; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:00:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:00:29 +0100 From: "Sebastian Spaeth" To: Jameson Rollins , Michal Sojka , James Vasile , notmuch@notmuchmail.org In-Reply-To: <87pr395zvi.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <87aauhp9kk.fsf@hackervisions.org> <87pr3bm2sn.fsf@steelpick.localdomain> <87fx46hq7w.fsf@hackervisions.org> <87ljdyn7zi.fsf@steelpick.localdomain> <876352hccg.fsf@softwarefreedom.org> <87iq92m12o.fsf@steelpick.localdomain> <87pr395zvi.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:00:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87ljdxpm1u.fsf@SSpaeth.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Change From and Bcc when creating reply draft buffer X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:00:35 -0000 On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:22:09 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote: > To me it seems the issue here is the distinction between the notmuch > CLI, and any other reader UI that uses it. AFAICT, the CLI actually has > no need to know what "your" email address is, so I don't see why it > should be configured in the notmuch config. Your reader on the other > hand does need to know, so it should be set there. +1. Except for making the "from:~me" synonym available for searches :) > This is related to another current pet peeve of mine which is that > notmuch puts my email address in the Bcc: field in my response template. > I do not want to bcc myself on my responses. Generally, I don't think > it should be the business of the CLI to set any of the header fields in > mail that I send out. +1 I agree. The mailer should be putting a BCC in, if that is what the user wants, not notmuch Sebastian